Both Hán Tử Long anh Nguyễn Ngọc Năm couldn’t break a new ground in that case. They coud demand a little bit fair, that meant they’re luckier than their colleagues who were named "left side." It was obviously that, their claims couldn’t success without their superviors’ agreements at VOV, and the senior officers’ at the police agency of Vĩnh Yên province. Both sides – who had to beat or were beaten - were also paid by "payroll," so it was very difficult if they would like to show their own ideas.

However their compensation couldn’t present any good thing. It was just a resolving way, let the authorities’ internal relations were better than. People felt unfair because the cases of Nguyễn Hữu Vinh or Nguyễn Chí Đức couldn’t be clarified by justice. What they did just let public knew clearly that, the government’s actions tried to mean they have never been above the law with any one else, they only did what so-called implicit rules between governmental agencies together.

From Văn Giang to Đồng Chiêm may be our coutry’s constitution and law had to divide two kinds of people, in order to cary out its mission successfully; one constitution and law to protect power elites and another for oppressed people. So public had to accept at the end of the day, and that’s the way to study deeply about communism, there was no need to look for where was central argument council?